Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Joris De Loore vs Juan Manuel Cerundolo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Loore vs Cerundolo analysis and find out who is favored!
Joris De Loore vs Juan Manuel Cerundolo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Loore 0 - 0 Cerundolo
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Loore has won 49.61% of points on his second serve, while Cerundolo has won 50.22%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Loore, in recent form, has won 41.84% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cerundolo has won 54.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.65% and 34.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Loore has saved 58.04% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cerundolo has saved 51.96% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Loore has won 51.79% of matches played (W/L 29/ 27), with Cerundolo winning 47.62% (W/L 30/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Loore has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 115/ 53), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5). Cerundolo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 206/ 120), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Loore has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 24/ 21), where as Cerundolo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.28% of matches (W/L 20/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Loore has played against opponents with an average rank of 256.48 while Cerundolo has played against players with an average rank of 285.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Loore has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cerundolo has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Loore has converted 34.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cerundolo has converted 45.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Loore 0 - 0 Cerundolo
208
Rank
142
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
167
Rank
79
High
22
Age
L
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
65% (409-222)
Career Total W/L
61% (215-137)
40% (8-12)
YTD W/L
48% (14-15)
$101,635
Career Prize Money
$351,575
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Joris De Loore | Juan Manuel Cerundolo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (8/12) | 48% (14/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (20/29) | 51% (35/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (233/262) | 51% (310/298) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 52% (14/13) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.7 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 171 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 44 | 86 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:7 | 1:42:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 274.75 | 252.28 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1015/1525) | 63% (1164/1843) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (732/1015) | 63% (733/1164) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (253/510) | 50% (341/679) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (30/86) | 46% (97/212) |
| Return Pts W% | 32% (481/1508) | 42% (807/1914) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (4/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 50% (10/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (8/20) | 52% (14/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (8/13) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 65% (17/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 35% (17/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 25% (12/3) |
Joris De Loore Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Joris De Loore
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
42
Total Points Won
21
|
6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Vit Kopriva
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Gastao Elias
79%
(
59 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Joris De Loore
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
55)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Joris De Loore
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
86)
2
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
34 of
42)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Joris De Loore
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Joris De Loore
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
40
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Joris De Loore
75%
(
65 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
7
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
54 of
65)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
58 of
74)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
19 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
29 of
103)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
4
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Radu Albot
70%
(
68 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
68 of
104)
15
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
30 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Juan Manuel Cerundolo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(2) 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Sandro Kopp
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Gabriel Diallo
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
77%
(
74 of
96)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Federico Salomone
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
84 of
115)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Loore Vs Cerundolo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
